Digital identity network alerts

ABSTRACT

Systems and methods are disclosed for detecting certain online activities associated with a digital identity. A Digital Identity Network may be monitored for potentially fraudulent activities (such as new account openings and certain transactions) related to an enrolled User identification (User ID) without requiring personally identifying information (PII). Corresponding alerts may be generated and sent to inform the associated user of such suspicious activity so that fraudulent account access or transactions may be prevented.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation claiming priority under 35 U.S.C. §120 to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/952,243, filed 19 Nov. 2020and published as U.S. Patent Publication No. US2022/0158982 on 19 May2022 and incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth.

FIELD

The disclosed technology generally relates to Internet security, and todetection and prevention of potential identity theft cybercrimes byutilizing event-driven alerts.

BACKGROUND

As businesses worldwide become more reliant on the Internet for digitalcommunications and transactions, the ever-increasing presence andsophistication of cybercrime requires new strategies to distinguishtrusted customers from cybercriminals.

Private identity information is typically required for opening onlineaccounts and/or for authenticating a user for online transactions.Passwords, usernames, Social Security numbers, credit card numbers, andother sensitive identity-related information can be stolen by criminalsand utilized unbeknownst to a victim, often creating costly financialissues and severe inconveniences for the victim. If a fraudster gainsaccess to a user's account, login information can be changed, and theuser may be unable to access his or her account.

Clues that indicate identity theft can include unexplained bank accountwithdrawals, unfamiliar accounts or charges on a credit report, missingmail, checks refused by merchants, calls from debt collectors aboutunknown debts, rejected medical bill claims, etc. All too often, whenidentity information is stolen and used for fraud, the victim may notrealize the severity of the damage until it is too late to prevent it.

In response to the Internet-age problem of increasing identity theftincidents, several identity monitoring and/or recovery services haverecently emerged to help victims of data breaches and identity theft.Such services may utilize traditional databases, such as the NationalChange of Address database, for example, to check if a user's mail isbeing redirected. The effectiveness of identity monitoring depends onfactors such as the quality and accuracy of the databases, how often theservice checks each database, etc. There also may be activities that aservice cannot monitor, such as those related to taxes, governmentbenefits, and/or real-time online activities. Furthermore, theconventional use of matching personally identifiable information (PII)to directly detect activities involving possible identity theft canitself create serious privacy and security issues.

A need exists for improved methods of detecting and identifying threatsof online fraud in real-time or near real-time to prevent or limit suchidentity theft-related cybercrimes.

BRIEF SUMMARY

Some or all of the above needs may be addressed by certainimplementations of the disclosed technology. Systems and methods aredisclosed herein for detecting certain online activities associated witha digital identity representative of a user. Certain implementations ofthe disclosed technology may provide alerts when online activity relatedto the digital identity is detected, for example, via a webserver havingan installed website application programming interface (API). In certainexemplary implementations, an anonymized Digital Identity Network (DIN)may monitor online activities for potentially fraudulent events (such asnew account openings) related to an enrolled user identification (UserID) without requiring the direct use of personally identifiableinformation (PII). Corresponding alerts may be generated and sent toinform the associated user of such suspicious activity so that furtherfraudulent account access or transactions may be prevented.

According to an example implementation, a system is provided. The systemincludes one or more processors, memory in communication with the one ormore processors, and instructions stored in the memory that, whenexecuted by the one or more processors, cause the system to perform:receiving, via a communications network, user identification (User ID)and associated personal identification information (PII) responsive toinitiation of identity monitoring enrollment of a user via a userdevice; extracting, from the user device, unique device identification(Device ID); generating an anonymized digital identification (DigitalID) based on one or more of the Device ID and the PII; associating theDigital ID with the User ID; detecting, via a Digital Identity Network(DIN) in communication with a plurality of website applicationprogramming interfaces (APIs) executing on a corresponding plurality ofwebsites, an identity-related event corresponding to the Digital ID;determining, using a machine learning model in communication with theone or more processors, whether the identity-related event meets one ormore threshold criteria; generating an alert responsive to the thresholdcriteria being met by the identity-related event; and transmitting thealert.

In an another example implementation, a computer-implemented method isprovided that includes receiving user identification (User ID) andassociated personal identification information (PII) responsive toinitiation of identity monitoring enrollment of a user via a userdevice; extracting, from the user device, unique device identification(Device ID); generating an anonymized digital identification (DigitalID) based on one or more of the Device ID and the PII; associating theDigital ID with the User ID; detecting, via a Digital Identity Network(DIN) in communication with a plurality of website applicationprogramming interfaces (APIs) executing on a corresponding plurality ofwebsites, an identity-related event corresponding to the Digital ID;determining, using a machine learning model in communication with theone or more processors, whether the identity-related event meets one ormore threshold criteria; generating an alert responsive to the thresholdcriteria being met by the identity-related event; and transmitting thealert.

According to another example implementation, computer-readable media isprovided. The computer-readable media includes computer-executableinstructions that, when executed by one or more processors, cause theone or more processors to perform a method of: receiving useridentification (User ID) and associated personal identificationinformation (PII) responsive to initiation of identity monitoringenrollment of a user via a user device; extracting, from the userdevice, unique device identification (Device ID); generating ananonymized digital identification (Digital ID) based on one or more ofthe Device ID and the PII; associating the Digital ID with the User ID;detecting, via a Digital Identity Network (DIN) in communication with aplurality of website application programming interfaces (APIs) executingon a corresponding plurality of websites, an identity-related eventcorresponding to the Digital ID; determining, using a machine learningmodel in communication with the one or more processors, whether theidentity-related event meets one or more threshold criteria; generatingan alert responsive to the threshold criteria being met by theidentity-related event; and transmitting the alert.

Other implementations, features, and aspects of the disclosed technologyare described in detail herein and are considered a part of the claimeddisclosed technology. Other implementations, features, and aspects canbe understood with reference to the following detailed description,accompanying drawings, and claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Reference will now be made to the accompanying figures and flowdiagrams, which are not necessarily drawn to scale, and wherein:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an illustrative Digital Identity NetworkAlert system 100 for providing alerts based on detected activitiesindicative of potential fraudulent use of a user's identity, accordingto an example implementation of the disclosed technology.

FIG. 2 illustrates an example process 200 that may be utilized by theDigital Identity Network Alert system 100 of FIG. 1 for detectingtransactions indicative of potential or actual identity-theft andproviding associated alerts, according to an example implementation ofthe disclosed technology.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an example alert system infrastructure 300in which a message bus broker may be utilized, according to an exampleimplementation of the disclosed technology.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an example computing device 400, accordingto an example implementation of the disclosed technology.

FIG. 5 is an illustrative flow diagram 500 of a process for user anddevice enrollment, according to an example implementation of thedisclosed technology.

FIG. 6 is an illustrative flow diagram 600 of a process for eventmonitoring, alert gatekeeping, and refinement, according to an exampleimplementation of the disclosed technology.

FIG. 7 illustrates the different layers of processes 700 that may beutilized in certain example implementations of the disclosed technology.

FIG. 8 is a flow diagram of a method 800, according to an exampleimplementation of the disclosed technology.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Various example embodiments of the disclosed technology now will bedescribed more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanyingdrawings, in which some, but not all embodiments of the disclosure areshown. This technology may, however, be embodied in many different formsand should not be construed as limited to the implementations set forthherein; rather, these implementations are provided so that thisdisclosure will be thorough and complete, and will convey the scope ofthe disclosed technology to those skilled in the art.

The disclosed technology may be utilized to monitor online activitiesand provide alerts responsive to the detection of potential or actualfraudulent online activity related to a user while protecting the user'ssensitive personal data. Certain implementations of the disclosedtechnology may be utilized by an identity monitoring service, forexample, to monitor online activities and provide timely alerts toassociated users without creating privacy issues. As discussed in U.S.Pat. No. 10,764,297, which is incorporated herein by reference as ifpresented in full, a unique digital identification (Digital ID), forexample, may be created for each user via anonymized personaidentifiers, which can include alphanumeric identifiers that representthe user and all known attributes connected to the user's identity.

In certain exemplary implementations, one or more alerts may be providedresponsive to detected online activity that corresponds to the user'sDigital ID, for example, via a website monitoring applicationprogramming interface (API) installed on an enrolled business webserver.The website monitoring API, for example can capture online transactioninformation that can include, but is not limited to: details about theuser device; the user's location; the type of connection used for thetransaction; the user's email address; the user transaction volume; howmuch time the user spends on a webpage; etc. Over multiple transactions,this information may be utilized to build the unique Digital ID for thatuser. The Digital ID may represent a unique amalgamation of details theusers create as they conduct online transactions and activity. Incertain exemplary implementations, each Digital ID may evolve into agenuine global digital identity over time by leveraging the complex,networked inter-relationships between every piece of informationgathered in each transaction.

According to certain exemplary implementations of the disclosedtechnology, the Digital ID may be created using an algorithm thatexamines relationships between select entities in real-time and may useweighted sums in the calculation. In certain exemplary implementations,a confidence score may be generated to indicate how closely the entitiesin the current transaction match the entities of the Digital ID assignedto that transaction.

According to certain exemplary implementations, personally identifiableinformation (PII) associated with a user may be utilized to generate theuser's Digital ID. The Digital ID may be generated using PII havingattributes such as usernames, email addresses, phone numbers ship-toaddresses, payment card information, IP addresses, device profiles,online activities, transactions, etc. However, the PII may be secured byone or more of: encryption, indirect use of the PII by the generatedDigital ID, and utilization of a Digital Identity Network (DIN), whichdoes not store PII. The attributes, and the relationships between theseattributes, may be amassed through a DIN, which can process millions ofdaily digital transactions, from tens of thousands of websites andmobile apps around the world.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram depicting an illustrative Digital IdentityNetwork Alert system 100 configured to provide alerts responsive to oneor more detected activities indicative of potential or actual fraudulentuse of an enrolled user's identity information.

As a first step, a user 102 may initiate a request for enrollment withan identity monitoring service 104. During the enrollment process, theuser 102 may utilize their own user device 106 to input their basicidentity information, such as name, e-mail address, phone number,physical address, etc., which may be collectively considered to be partof the user's PII 103 that can also include additional “sensitive”personal information such as bank account information, Social Securitynumber, driver's license number, passport number, etc.

The user device 106 may transmit the entered information to the identitymonitoring service 104, for example, via a wide-area network such as theInternet 120. Since identity information entered by the user 102 maycomprise sensitive PII 103, it may be transmitted in an encrypted formover secure connections. For example, the widely used TCP/IPcommunication protocol includes security protocols built on the securesocket layer (SSL) protocol to allow secure data transfer usingencrypted data. SSL may be utilized by the system 100 to provideencryption, source authentication, and data integrity as a means forprotecting the PII 103 and/or any additional required enrollmentinformation exchanged between the user device 106 and the IdentityMonitoring Service 104 servers.

In certain exemplary implementations, the enrollment information and/orany additional PII 103 gathered during enrollment may correspond toauthentication “knowledge” factors that can correspond to (or be used toverify) something that the user 102 knows. Such information may easilybe provided by the authentic user 102 but could require a perpetrator ofidentity fraud to perform spoofing, phishing, hacking, etc., to obtainsuch information. In some implementations, the enrollment informationgathered from the user 102 may be utilized to independently obtainadditional PII 103 information related the user 102 (for example, fromone or more independent sources) and/or to independently verify theenrollment information provided by the user 102.

As depicted by the dashed ovals around the Identity Monitoring Service104 and the Risk Defense Platform 130 of FIG. 1 , the PII 103 related tothe user 102 may be stored by the Identity Monitoring Service 104 andcommunicated only to a Risk Defense Platform 130, for which a Digital ID114 representative of the user 102 may be generated without requiringthe PII 103 to be shared or stored elsewhere on the system 100. Bysequestering the PII 103, generating a representative Digital ID 114,and associating the Digital ID 114 with the User ID, the DigitalIdentity Network 132 may monitor activity on various business servers122 and associated webpages 124 (via an installed website monitoring API126) without requiring any PII 103 to be further transmitted elsewherein this process, thus limiting or eliminating any related privacysecurity issues that could result from the transmission or unintendedexposure of the PII 103.

Also, during the enrollment process with the Identity Monitoring Service104, the user device 106 may be assessed to produce a device profile108, which may serve as an additional security layer in that it may beused to verify something that the user 102 has in their possession. Thedevice profile 108 can be based on (or include) user device 106information such as current cellular service provider, media files,capacity, system information, model number, serial number, Wi-Fiaddress, Bluetooth address, IMEI number, ICCID number, firmware version,installed drivers, installed fonts, etc.

In certain exemplary implementations, the assessment of the user device106 may be performed via a Javascript attribute query API 133 integratedinto the DIN 132. In other exemplary implementations, the assessment ofthe user device 106 may be performed via a Javascript device assessmentAPI (not shown) integrated on a website of the Identity MonitoringService 104. For new users 102, the assessment process of the userdevice 106 may be performed during new account creation. For existingusers, the assessment process of the user device 106 may be done througha separate registration process. In certain example implementations thedevice assessment API and/or the attribute query API 133 may request andreceive a policy from the Identity Theft Protection Service 110 (ITPS).This policy may set global trust tags specific to the ITPS 110 productthat contain a unique customer identifier specific to the IdentityMonitoring Service 104. This unique customer identifier may be used as ameans of correlating data when an actual or potential identity theftsituation occurs and is detected. In certain exemplary implementations,additional policies relating to actions such as unenroll (trust tagremove in the policy) or update (trust tag remove+trust tag set in thepolicy) may be utilized, as appropriate, by the Identity MonitoringService 104.

During (or after) the assessment of the user device 106, all or part ofthe device profile 108 information may be transmitted to the IdentityTheft Protection Service 110 (ITPS), which as will be discussed below,can be utilized together with a generated Digital ID 114 to monitor anddetect various online activities related to the user 102, such as newaccount openings, change of address requests, loan applications, socialmedia activities, order transactions, payment transactions, accountlogins, etc.

The enrollment process may include the creation of an account for theuser 102 by the Identity Monitoring Service 104. Accordingly, a uniqueUser ID comprising an alphanumeric string, for example, may beassociated with the enrolled user 102. This User ID may be transmittedby the Identity Monitoring Service 104 to the ITPS 110. The ITPS 110 mayutilize the User ID for association with a generated Digital ID 114, andthe User ID may be used to identify the associated user 102 when alertsare communicated back to the Identity Monitoring Service 102 upondetection via the Digital Identity Network (DIN) 132 of an online eventrelated to the user 102, which will be further discussed below. Incertain exemplary implementations, the User ID utilized by the system100 can differ from a username that the user 102 utilizes to login tothe Identity Monitoring Service 104.

As depicted in FIG. 1 , the DIN 132 can communicate with servers 122corresponding to a variety of businesses and/or governmental agenciesthat provide online interactions with their customers 134 via a websitemonitoring API 126 integrated into respective websites 124. The websitemonitoring API 126 may be configured to communicate certain identifyinginformation about the customer 134 and/or the customer's device 136 tothe DIN 132 responsive to online activities (account openings,transactions, etc.,) conducted via the website 124. In response, and incertain exemplary implementations, the DIN 132 may communicate thisinformation to the ITPS 110, which may check for correlation with any ofthe previously generated Digital IDs 114, which may correspond toenrolled users 102 and/or user devices 106 for which a device profile108 was obtained.

In certain implementations, an alert identifying the User ID may be sentto the Identity Monitoring Service 104 when certain events occur thatare indicative of possible fraudulent use of an enrolled user's 102identity information, such as (but not limited to) new account openings,change of address requests, loan applications, social media activities,order transactions, payment transactions, account logins, etc.Accordingly, the alerts can provide timely information for the IdentityMonitoring Service 104 to stem identity theft activities and preventfurther related damage. In some implementations, the alerts of the(potentially suspicious) activity may also be provided directly toenrolled users 102 (via their user device 106, for example) so that theenrolled user 102 may indicate that the alert corresponds to alegitimate use of their identity.

In accordance with certain exemplary implementations of the disclosedtechnology, when an enrolled user 102 is also the customer 134 who isaccessing a business website 124 with a device 136 that has beenpreviously associated with the user's 102 Digital ID 114, the system maynot generate an alert. However, in some instances, if the device 136location information differs from a region of the enrolled user 102residence (i.e., a different country, or a region known to correspond tohigh crime rates), the alert may be generated. In certainimplementations, when an account login is detected at a first location,then another event using the same login information is detected atsecond location exceed a threshold distance from the first location fora given period, an alert may be generated. In accordance with certainexemplary implementations of the disclosed technology, when an enrolleduser 102 uses a device 136 that is either new or that differs from anenrolled device 106 (for which the device profile 108 is known), analert may be generated.

When an alert is generated, the details of the event that generated thealert may be sent to the RDP 130 and a custom alert may then begenerated through the ITPS 110 and sent to the Identity MonitoringService 104, which may then use this alert to notify their enrolled user102 of the event that took place associated with their identity.

In accordance with certain exemplary implementations of the disclosedtechnology, the ITPS 110 may store the Digital ID 114 together with theUser ID in a database 112. However, the PII 103 gathered or derived atthe time of enrollment may not be stored in the database 112, thuseffectively anonymizing the Digital ID 114. With the generated DigitalID 114 (that can be indirectly related to the PII 103 at the RDP 130),the system 100 can monitor for activities across the entire DIN 132. Incertain exemplary implementations, the RDP 130 may map or associateDigital IDs 114 with corresponding enrolled users 102. When a monitoreddigital identity is seen in a transaction on any of the websites 124 incommunication with the DIN 132, an alert can be generated. In accordancewith certain exemplary implementations of the disclosed technology, theRDP 130 may pick up these alerts using the User ID provided by theIdentity Monitoring Company 104. In certain exemplary implementations,the RDP 130 may generate an alert for the enrolled user's 102 of theIdentity Monitoring Company 104.

In certain implementations, the DIN 132 may track transactions via thewebsite monitoring API's 126 installed on partner websites 124 and anyirregular or anomalous transaction data may be identified and captured,for example, to determine if the transaction would warrant an alert. Incertain exemplary implementations (and as will be further discussedbelow with reference to FIG. 4 ), a message bus may be utilized as acommunication system between the DIN 132 and the ITPS 110 to providemutually interacting software applications in a service-orientedarchitecture. In certain exemplary implementations, a global policy maybe utilized to call certain logic functions in the ITPS 110 for everydetected transaction event. Accordingly, the logic may check foridentity-theft-like anomalies. The logic functions may be flexible inthe sense that new logic may be added at-will. Those having skill in theart may recognize that flexibility in the logic functions may beimplemented via Project Portfolio Management, which may be used to gaugeprojects and associated tacks, for example, to enable features forcustomers.

In certain exemplary implementations, reason codes and associatedtransaction data may be placed on a message bus and pushed to a brokerupon detection of an anomalous event. In certain exemplaryimplementations, the message broker may cache messages in memory,providing the ITPS 110 to catch-up and/or keep current with thedecisioning and/or alerts. In certain exemplary implementations, themessage payload may include a unique identifier and one or moretriggered reason codes. The unique identifier, for example, may begenerated for a given User ID and may be correlated to a specific user102. The reason codes may identify the type of anomaly that caused thealert to be initiated. For example, one reason code may signify thedetection of multiple user devices associated with a user's emailaccount within a predetermined time period; another reason code maysignify detection of an actual or attempted user account login via avirtual machine; another reason code may signify actual or attempteduser account access using a device that was not previously profiled;another reason code may signify an unusual spending pattern; etc. Insome implementations, the payload may also include identifyinginformation regarding the industry of the customer whose event triggeredthe reason code.

In accordance with certain exemplary implementations of the disclosedtechnology, the IDPS 110 may include a message subscriber hooked intothe shared broker, which may be configured to ingest the message payloadfrom a policy engine and populate an events database. In someimplementations, the database may be a first-in-first-out (FIFO) stackcontaining the reason codes.

In certain exemplary implementations, the Identity Monitoring Service104 may request alerts (“get alerts”) from the ITPS 110, which inresponse, my return all of the generated alerts from the ITPS 110 andthe associated database. In other implementations, the system 100 may bepush-based (i.e. a consumer/producer model) to avoid continuous pollingof this endpoint.

In accordance with certain exemplary implementations of the disclosedtechnology, a real-time Dynamic Decision Platform (DDP) 140 may be incommunication with one or more of the ITPS 110 and the DIN 132, and mayinclude a real-time decisioning, for example, to determine if atransaction would be considered anomalous, to determine whether suchtransaction would warrant an alert, and/or to determine a risk level orcategory associated with the transaction. In certain exemplaryimplementations, the DDP 140 may incorporate and/or utilize behavioralanalytics, machine learning, case management, and and/or integrationcapabilities to make accurate and timely trust/risk decisions. Thebehavioral analytics utilized by the DDP 140 may include smart rules toenable better understanding of legitimate user behavior and to moreaccurately detect genuine fraud. The machine learning utilized by theDDP 140 may integrate digital identity intelligence with the(above-referenced) smart rules to produce optimized models with fewerfalse positives. In certain exemplary implementations, a workflow andprocess orchestration may be utilized to integrate external data sourcesinto the DDP 140. In certain exemplary implementations, pre-integratedthird-party services may be accessed for transactions that requireadditional assurance and/or exception handling. In certain exemplaryimplementations, case management may be utilized to enable continuousoptimization of authentication and fraud decisions by monitoring,updating and isolating transactions that require additional review.Accordingly, the disclosed technology provides certain technicalsolutions to the practical application of identity theft detectionand/or prevention and provides an improved process and system to assessand provide alerts for increasingly complex transactions caseloads withshrinking resources.

FIG. 2 illustrates an example process 200 for detecting transactionsindicative of potential or actual identity-theft and for providingassociated alerts, according to an example implementation of thedisclosed technology. In certain exemplary implementations, the DigitalIdentity Network Alert system 100 as discussed above with respect toFIG. 1 may be utilized for part or all of the process 200. The process200 may commence after enrollment of the user 102, which may includedevice profiling of the user device 106, and the creation of the DigitalID 114, as discussed previously.

As a first step of the process 200, the ITPS 110 may call an attributequery API 133, for example, to execute a policy with alert criteria. Incertain exemplary implementations, the attribute query API 133 mayselectively commit the Digital ID 114 to the DIN 132. In certainexemplary implementations, the alert criteria may include location-basedcriteria. For example, when an account login is detected at a firstlocation, then another event using the same login information isdetected at second location exceed a threshold distance from the firstlocation for a given period, an alert may be generated. In certainexemplary implementations, the alert criteria may include unusualspending habits, and when an unusual pattern of spending is detectedrelated to the Digital ID 114, an alert may be generated. In certainexemplary implementations, the alert criteria may include certain loginactivities in which alerts may be generated upon detection of a highlogin velocity and/or exceeding a threshold number of password resetrequests.

In a second step of the process 200, the attribute query API 133 mayfetch results from the DIN 132, which may be completely anonymized sothat the Digital ID 114 may be associated, for example, with a User IDprovided by the Identity Monitoring Service 104, but not with the PII.In certain exemplary implementations, the fetched results may be sentback to the ITPS 110 via response by the attribute query API 133.

In a third step of the process 200, the ITPS 110 may notify the RDP 130that alert criteria is met for a Digital ID 114.

In a fourth step of the process 200, the RDP 130 may notify the IdentityMonitoring Service 104 backend of the alert, associated context, andsufficient information to identify the user 102 (such as the User ID)without requiring any PII to be used in this identification process.This privacy feature, in which the DIN 132 may be completely anonymized,allows the DIN 132 to monitor websites 124 via the website APIs 126 foractivity related to the Digital ID 114. Once a transaction related to aDigital ID 114 is detected, alert data may be sent via the website API126 to the RDP 130, which may store PII that is associated with the UserID provided by the Identity monitoring company. In certain exemplaryimplementations, the alert including a vendor ID and User ID may be sentto the Identity Monitoring Service 104.

In a fifth step of the process 200, the Identity Monitoring Service 104backend may transfer the alert (and associated context) to an AlertService 202, which may alert the user 102 whenever an abnormaltransaction or related activity is detected that could be indicative ofidentity theft-related activity.

In certain exemplary implementations, once the user 102 receives thealert, the user 102 may respond to confirm that the alert corresponds tolegitimate activity or not. Such feedback may be used by the machinelearning model and/or associated behavioral analytics utilized by theDDP 140 to further refine understanding of legitimate user behavior andto more accurately detect genuine fraud. If the detected activity isflagged by the user 102 as unknown, non-legitimate, or otherwisefraudulent in appearance, the Identity Monitoring Service 104 (and/orthe user 102) may intervene with the corresponding business, forexample, to terminate the associated transaction, or otherwise stop thefraudulent activity.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an example alert system infrastructure 300in which a message bus broker 312 may be utilized for messagecommunications between a first node 302 and a second node 304 of aDigital Identity Network Alert system (such as system 100 as discussedabove with reference to FIG. 1 ). In accordance with certain exemplaryimplementations of the disclosed technology, the first node 302 may bethe DIN 132 and the second node 304 may be the RDP 130, the ITPS 110, orthe DDP 140 as illustrated in FIG. 1 . In other exemplaryimplementations, the first node 302 may be the ITPS 110 and the secondnode 304 may be the RDP 130, or the Identity Monitoring Service 104, asillustrated in FIG. 1 .

As an example where the DIN 132 is the first node 302 and the ITPS 110is the second node 304, the ITPS 110 may include a message bussubscriber 312 hooked into the shared message bus broker 312, which maybe configured to ingest the message payload 311 from message busproducer 310 associated with the first node 302 (i.e., the DIN 132 inthis case). In certain exemplary implementations, a global policy 306may utilize identity anomaly detection logic and/or trust-tag-checkrules as gatekeepers for detected transactions or events, and suchgatekeepers may be utilized to evaluate the transaction or event andinitiate or suppress a corresponding alert. In certain exemplaryimplementations, a customer policy 308 (for example, as associated withthe Identity Monitoring Service 104) may further refine or reviserequirements of the detection logic and/or rules of the global policy306.

In certain exemplary implementations, and as briefly discussed above,certain reason codes and associated transaction data may be used to formthe message payload 311, and the message payload 311 may be placed on amessage bus via the message bus producer 310. In certain exemplaryimplementations, the message may be pushed to the message bus broker 312upon detection (and gatekeeping) of an anomalous event. In certainexemplary implementations, the message bus broker 312 may cache messagesin memory, allowing second node 304 (e.g., the ITPS 110 in this case) tocatch-up and/or keep current with the decisioning and/or alerts. Incertain exemplary implementations, the message payload 311 may include aunique identifier and one or more triggered reason codes. The uniqueidentifier, for example, may be generated for a given User ID and may becorrelated to a specific user 102. The reason codes may identify thetype of anomaly that caused the alert to be initiated. For example, onereason code may signify the detection of multiple user devicesassociated with a user's email account within a predetermined timeperiod; another reason code may signify detection of an actual orattempted user account login via a virtual machine; another reason codemay signify actual or attempted user account access using a device thatwas not previously profiled; another reason code may signify an unusualspending pattern; etc. In some implementations, the message payload 311may also include identifying information regarding the industry of thecustomer whose event triggered the reason code.

In accordance with certain exemplary implementations of the disclosedtechnology, the second node 304 (e.g., the ITPS 110 in this examplecase) may include a message bus subscriber 314 in communication with theshared message bus broker 312, which may be configured to ingest themessage payload 311 a populate an alerts database or stack 316 fortransmission. In certain exemplary implementations, the database 316 maybe a first-in-first-out (FIFO) stack. In certain exemplaryimplementations, alert push and/or pull logic 318 may be utilized tocontrol delivery of the associated alerts. For example, in oneembodiment, the Identity Monitoring Service 104 may specify pulling oftheir stacked alerts in a periodic fashion, such as every 10 minutes. Inanother embodiment, the Identity Monitoring Service 104 may wish to haveany alerts pushed to them as they are generated to avoid continuouspolling. In another embodiment, the Identity Monitoring Service 104 mayrequest alerts (“get alerts”) from the ITPS 110, which in response, mayreturn all the generated alerts from the ITPS 110 and the associateddatabase 316.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a computing device 400, according to anexample implementation of the disclosed technology. In certain exampleimplementations, the computing device 400 may be embodied as the userdevice 106, as shown in FIG. 1 . In certain example implementations, thecomputing device 400 may be embodied as the server(s) 122, as shown inFIG. 1 . In certain example implementations, the computing device 400may be embodied as the first node 302 and/or the second node 304 asshown in FIG. 3 .

The computing device 400 of FIG. 4 includes a central processing unit(CPU) 402, where computer instructions are processed; a displayinterface 404 that acts as a communication interface and providesfunctions for rendering video, graphics, images, and texts on thedisplay. In certain example implementations of the disclosed technology,the display interface 404 may be directly connected to a local display,such as a touch-screen display associated with a mobile computingdevice. In another example implementation, the display interface 404 maybe configured for providing data, images, and other information for anexternal/remote display that is not necessarily physically connected tothe computing device. For example, a desktop monitor may be utilized formirroring graphics and other information that is presented on thecomputing device 400. In certain example implementations, the displayinterface 404 may wirelessly communicate, for example, via a Wi-Fichannel or other available network connection interface 412 to anexternal/remote display.

In an example implementation, the network connection interface 412 maybe configured as a communication interface, for example, to providefunctions for rendering video, graphics, images, text, otherinformation, or any combination thereof on the display. In one example,a communication interface may include a serial port, a parallel port, ageneral purpose input and output (GPIO) port, a game port, a universalserial bus (USB), a micro-USB port, a high definition multimedia (HDMI)port, a video port, an audio port, a Bluetooth port, a near-fieldcommunication (NFC) port, another like communication interface, or anycombination thereof.

The computing device 400 may include a keyboard interface 406 thatprovides a communication interface to a keyboard. In one exampleimplementation, the computing device 400 may include a pointing deviceand/or touch screen interface 408. According to certain exampleimplementations of the disclosed technology, the pointing device and/ortouch screen interface 408 may provide a communication interface tovarious devices such as a pointing device, a touch screen, a depthcamera, etc. which may or may not be associated with a display.

The computing device 400 may be configured to use an input device viaone or more of input/output interfaces (for example, the keyboardinterface 406, the display interface 404, the touch screen interface408, network connection interface 412, camera interface 414, soundinterface 416, etc.,) to allow a user to capture information into thecomputing device 400. The input device may include a mouse, a trackball,a directional pad, a track pad, a touch-verified track pad, apresence-sensitive track pad, a presence-sensitive display, a scrollwheel, a digital camera, a digital video camera, a web camera, amicrophone, a sensor such as an accelerometer or gyroscope, a smartcard,iris reader, fingerprint reader, voiceprint reader, and the like.Additionally, the input device may be integrated with the computingdevice 400 or may be a separate device.

Example implementations of the computing device 400 may include anantenna interface 410 that provides a communication interface to anantenna; a network connection interface 412 that provides acommunication interface to a network. In certain implementations, acamera interface 414 is provided for capturing digital images, forexample, from a camera. In certain implementations, a sound interface416 is provided as a communication interface for converting sound intoelectrical signals using a microphone and for converting electricalsignals into sound using a speaker. According to exampleimplementations, a random-access memory (RAM) 418 is provided, wherecomputer instructions and data may be stored in a volatile memory devicefor processing by the CPU 402.

According to an example implementation, the computing device 400includes a read-only memory (ROM) 420 where invariant low-level systemcode or data for basic system functions such as basic input and output(I/O), startup, or reception of keystrokes from a keyboard are stored ina non-volatile memory device. According to an example implementation,the computing device 400 includes a storage medium 422 or other suitabletype of memory (e.g. such as RAM, ROM, programmable read-only memory(PROM), erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), electricallyerasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), magnetic disks, opticaldisks, floppy disks, hard disks, removable cartridges, flash drives),where the files include an operating system 424, application programs426 (including, for example, a web browser application, an invoiceextraction module, etc.) and data files 428 are stored. According to anexample implementation, the computing device 400 includes a power source430 that provides an appropriate alternating current (AC) or directcurrent (DC) to power components. According to an exampleimplementation, the computing device 400 may include and a telephonysubsystem 432 that allows the device 400 to transmit and receive soundover a telephone network. The constituent devices and the CPU 402communicate with each other over a bus 434.

In accordance with an example implementation, the CPU 402 hasappropriate structure to be a computer processor. In one arrangement,the computer CPU 402 may include more than one processing unit. The RAM418 interfaces with the computer bus 434 to provide quick RAM storage tothe CPU 402 during the execution of software programs such as theoperating system application programs, and device drivers. Morespecifically, the CPU 402 loads computer-executable process steps fromthe storage medium 422 or other media into a field of the RAM 418 inorder to execute software programs. Data may be stored in the RAM 418,where the data may be accessed by the computer CPU 402 during execution.In one example configuration, the device 400 includes at least 128 MB ofRAM, and 256 MB of flash memory.

The storage medium 422 itself may include a number of physical driveunits, such as a redundant array of independent disks (RAID), a floppydisk drive, a flash memory, a USB flash drive, an external hard diskdrive, thumb drive, pen drive, key drive, a High-Density DigitalVersatile Disc (HD-DVD) optical disc drive, an internal hard disk drive,a Blu-Ray optical disc drive, or a Holographic Digital Data Storage(HDDS) optical disc drive, an external mini-dual in-line memory module(DIMM) synchronous dynamic random access memory (SDRAM), or an externalmicro-DIMM SDRAM. Such computer readable storage media allow the device400 to access computer-executable process steps, application programsand the like (such as the processes described in FIGS. 1-5 ) that arestored on removable and non-removable memory media, to off-load datafrom the device 400 or to upload data onto the device 400. A computerprogram product, such as one utilizing a communication system may betangibly embodied in storage medium 422, which may comprise amachine-readable storage medium.

Various implementations of the communication systems and methods hereinmay be embodied in non-transitory computer readable media for executionby a processor. An example implementation may be used in an applicationof a mobile computing device, such as a smartphone or tablet, but othercomputing devices may also be used, such as to portable computers,tablet PCs, Internet tablets, PDAs, ultra-mobile PCs (UMPCs), etc.

FIG. 5 is an illustrative flow diagram of a process 500 for user anddevice enrollment according to an example implementation of thedisclosed technology. Certain elements and implementations of theenrollment process 500 may correspond to those discussed above withrespect to FIG. 1 . In block 502 of the enrollment process 500, the usermay enroll to establish an account with the Identity Monitoring Serviceby establishing a username and by entering certain personallyidentifiable information (PII), which may include (but is not limitedto) typical PII such as full name, mailing address, e-mail address,phone number, date of birth, etc. In some implementations, the IdentityMonitoring Company may request or require additional PII, such as SocialSecurity number, city of birth, credit card number, etc. In someimplementations, the PII entered may include “sensitive” informationthat would only be used for positively identifying or authenticating theuser. In certain implementations, data provided by the user may beencrypted, for example, by a secure socket layer (SSL) protocol toensure source authentication and data integrity as a means forprotecting the PII and/or any additional required enrollment informationexchanged between the user device, the Identity Monitoring Serviceservers, and/or affiliated service (such as the Identity TheftProtection Service 110 as discussed with respect to FIG. 1 ).

In block 504 of the enrollment process 500, the user device (i.e., thecomputing device that is utilized by the user for the enrollment process500) may be evaluated and the user device profile may be generated,saved, and associated with the user. In certain implementations, thedevice may be evaluated and profiled by a service affiliated, butindependent of the Identity Monitoring Service (for example, by theIdentity Theft Protection Service 110 as discussed with respect to FIG.1 ). The device profile can be based on (or include) user deviceinformation such as current cellular service provider, media files,capacity, system information, model number, serial number, Wi-Fiaddress, Bluetooth address, IMEI number, ICCID number, firmware version,installed drivers, installed fonts, etc.

In block 506 of the enrollment process 500, a Digital ID may begenerated and linked with the user. In certain exemplaryimplementations, the device profile may also be linked to the userand/or the Digital ID, for example, to monitor and detect various onlineactivities related to the user such as new account openings,transactions, change of address requests, loan applications, socialmedia activities, etc. As may be appreciated by those having skill inthe art, and as previously discussed herein, the Digital ID may beanonymized (and indirectly associated with the user) to eliminateprivacy issues and/or exposure of the user's personally identifiableinformation.

FIG. 6 is an illustrative flow diagram of a process 600 for eventmonitoring, alert gatekeeping, and (optional) refinement, according toan example implementation of the disclosed technology. The process 600may commence after enrollment, as discussed with respect to FIG. 5 . Inblock 602, the process 600 may utilize an application programminginterface (such as the website monitoring API 126 in communication witha Digital Identity Network and executing on an affiliated businesswebsite 124, as discussed with reference to FIG. 1 ) to monitor accountactivities (such as account openings, password resets, etc.) that may berelated to a Digital ID of a user who is enrolled with the IdentityMonitoring Service. Responsive to the detection of such activities, thewebsite monitoring API 126 may communicate the detection of suchactivity to the Digital Identity Network (DIN).

In block 604, the process 600 may include application of one or morerules and/or logic may be applied In certain exemplary implementations,identifying information related to the associated activity (such asvendor, time, device location, specific activity, etc.) and informationabout the associated Digital ID may be received and/or derived by DINfor further application of rules, logic, alert gatekeeping, etc. Incertain exemplary implementations, trust tags identifying trusted and/oruntrusted sources, users, user devices, etc. may be checked to improveefficiency, for example, so that additional time-consuming processingusing the rules and logic may be bypassed when an associated parameteris marked as trusted.

In decision block 606, the process 600 may include an evaluation ofwhether the detected activity is indicative of (actual or potential)identity theft. In certain implementations, this decision block 606 mayutilize the rules, logic, trust tags, etc. from block 604. In block 608,an alert may be sent to the Identity Monitoring Service upon anevaluation that an event or activity is indicative of (actual orpotential) identity theft. In certain exemplary implementations, suchalert may be sent directly to an associated enrolled user via theirprofiled user device. In block 610, if the event or activity isevaluated as safe, or not indicative or actual or potential identitytheft, the corresponding alert may be suppressed and not sent.

In block 612, the process 600 may utilize the decision/evaluation andany related information as input to a Machine Learning model that can beused, for example, as feedback to update or refine rules, logic, and/ortrust tags in block 604. Accordingly, the process 600 may be continuallyrefined to improve detection and identification of potentiallyfraudulent events, while suppressing false positives. In this respect,certain exemplary embodiments of the disclosed technology may provide animprovement in the underlying technology by improving alert processingspeeds and/or improving the reliability of the alert accuracy.

FIG. 7 illustrates the different layers of technical processes 700 thatmay be utilized in certain example implementations of the disclosedtechnology. In accordance with certain exemplary implementations of thedisclosed technology, a first layer 702 may be utilized to provideidentity and device intelligence to enable monitoring online activity,evaluate events, and provide appropriate alerts when irregular,suspicious, or (actual or potential) fraudulent activities or events aredetected.

TABLE 1 Sources and records utilized Source/Record Count (approximate)Public Records 80 billion+ Data Sources 10,000 Digital attributes 50billion+ (added annually) Mobile devices 1.5 billion Unique IP addresses700 million+ Unique Devices Identified 4.5 billion+ Digital IDs 1.4billion+ Unique E-mail addresses 800 million+ Unique mobile phones 290million+

Table 1 is a (partial) list of the types of records and sources (withapproximate number counts) that may be utilized by the systems andmethods disclosed herein. The records can include property records,bankruptcy records, criminal records, motor vehicle registration andtitle records, consumer names, consumer addresses, insurance claimrecords, business contact records, etc. Certain implementations of thedisclosed technology may utilize various database with crowdsourcedintelligence fed from millions daily events across thousands ofcustomers. Certain implementations may utilize/evaluate nearly 40billion events annually, with global coverage in 185 countries. Certainimplementations may identify bots and non-human session, profilefraudsters, detect session anomalies, identify humans, and identifytrusted customer behavior.

FIG. 7 also depicts a second layer 704, which may be utilized by thesystems and methods disclosed herein to provide decision analytics fordiscerning legitimate online activity from possible fraudulent activity.For example, in the use case of password resets, it has been determinedthat fraudsters are much more likely to populate associated fields in auser interface using paste rather than manual keyboard entry. Certainimplementations may utilize paste detection, typing speed, the use ofautofill, etc. as an indicator of potentially fraudulent activity. Inaccordance with certain exemplary implementations of the disclosedtechnology, the technical processes 700 may include a third layer 706 tohandle user authentication and verification. For example, a relatedprocess may include identity resolution, which may utilize multiplefields in a database to resolve and deduplicate records. The technicalprocesses 700 may include a fourth layer 708 directed to investigationand review of results obtained via the processes 702, 704, 706 of theprevious layer. Accordingly, as discussed above, feedback from thislayer may be utilized to refine workflow, reporting, policy, detectionaccuracy, etc.

FIG. 8 is an illustrative flow diagram of a method 800, according to anexample implementation of the disclosed technology. In block 802, themethod 800 includes receiving user identification (User ID) andassociated personal identification information (PII) responsive toinitiation of identity monitoring enrollment of a user via a userdevice. In block 804, the method 800 includes extracting, from the userdevice, unique device identification (Device ID). In block 806, themethod 800 includes generating an anonymized digital identification(Digital ID) based on one or more of the Device ID and the PII. In block808, the method 800 includes associating the Digital ID with the UserID. In block 810, the method 800 includes detecting, via a DigitalIdentity Network (DIN) in communication with a plurality of applicationprogramming interfaces (APIs) executing on a corresponding plurality ofwebsites, an identity-related event corresponding to the Digital ID. Inblock 812, the method 800 includes determining, using a machine learningmodel in communication with the one or more processors, whether theidentity-related event meets one or more threshold criteria. In block814, the method 800 includes generating an alert responsive to thethreshold criteria being met by the identity-related event. In block816, the method 800 includes transmitting the alert.

In certain exemplary implementations, the alert can include one or moreof the User ID and identification of the identity-related event. Incertain exemplary implementations, the alert may be transmitted to anidentity monitoring service associated with the enrollment of the user.In certain exemplary implementations, the alert may be sent via one ormore of text and e-mail to a user associated with the User ID.

In accordance with certain exemplary implementations of the disclosedtechnology, the threshold criteria may be based on one or more of rules,logic, and trust tags.

In certain exemplary implementations, results of the determining whetherthe identity-related event meets one or more threshold criteria may befed back to the machine learning model to refine the machine learningmodel.

In accordance with certain exemplary implementations of the disclosedtechnology, generating the Digital ID can include generating acombination of the User ID and the Device ID.

In accordance with certain exemplary implementations of the disclosedtechnology, the Digital Identity Network (DIN) may be in communicationwith a plurality of business servers that host the correspondingplurality of websites.

In certain exemplary implementations, the APIs are configured totransmit encrypted event information to the DIN.

In accordance with certain exemplary implementations of the disclosedtechnology, the Device ID can include one or more of: cellular serviceprovider, media files, capacity, system information, model number,serial number, Wi-Fi address, Bluetooth address, IMEI number, ICCIDnumber, firmware version, installed drivers, installed fonts, etc.

Certain implementations of the disclosed technology may be utilized toidentify individuals and/or networks associated with certain activitiesbased on geographical and/or social network mapping. In one exampleimplementation, a social network for an individual may be analyzed todetermine geographical locations of associates, relatives, businesspartners, etc., relative to certain activities. According to one exampleimplementation, the activities may be related to incidents of identitytheft. In another example implementation, the activities may be relatedto online purchases, for example, where goods may be shipped to a vacant(or foreclosed) address and locally monitored or controlled by a person(for retrieval of the goods) without being linked to the address.

In an example embodiment, time-dependent digital mapping of informationrelated to a Digital ID (associated with an enrolled user) may beutilized to identify one or more probable perpetrators of crimes orindividuals associated with certain activities. For example, in oneembodiment, a person's time-dependent digital mapping may be analyzedfor geographical proximities to locations associated with certainactivities and/or geographical proximities to addresses of identitytheft victims. In certain example embodiments, thresholds, weightings,etc., may be applied based on attributes of the information, and scoringmay be performed to produce confidence levels that a particular entitymay be involved in such activities.

In accordance with one example embodiment, a time-dependent digitalmapping may be determined for every person in a given population. Forexample, embodiments of the disclosed technology may be utilized todetermine time-dependent digital mapping for each person in the UnitedStates to determine individuals that are related in some way, including,but not limited to family, business associates, friends, past roommates,etc. In an example embodiment, locations, addresses, or regions of anactivity (for example, addresses of identity theft victims) may becompared with current home and/or work addresses for the people in anindividual's social network. In certain example embodiments, a distancemay be calculated between such locations. According to an exampleembodiment, such data may be utilized to identify certain patterns,confidence values, scores, etc. In an example implementation, allmembers of the social network may be considered. In other exampleimplementations, only individuals having certain connection criteria maybe considered to reduce the computation complexity.

Certain embodiments of the disclosed technology may provide improvedaccuracy over conventional systems and techniques. For example, lawenforcement departments attempting to identify perpetrators of certainfraudulent activities (such as identity theft) may utilize conventionalfocused analysis techniques that examine each event in isolation. Theconventional techniques typically utilize high thresholds to filter thelarge number of events to be analyzed. In other words, because the datathat must be analyzed with conventional techniques is so large, a highdegree of suspicious activity may be required in order to identifyindividuals or entities associated with the activity. Without a highthreshold, conventional techniques may have too many potentiallyfraudulent events to investigate. As a result, entities usingconventional techniques often overlook collusion from groups that areable to stay below these high thresholds with respect to certainsuspicious activities.

The systems and methods disclosed herein may be capable of efficientlyleveraging readily available data to help detect individuals involvedwith certain activities. According to an example implementation of thedisclosed technology, a large quantity of data may be grouped intosmaller, distinct units or networks. In an example embodiment, seeminglylow risk activity within each network may be measured to identifypotentially organized groups without having to apply low thresholds tothe large amounts of data as a whole.

In one example embodiment, a domain of entities may be identified foranalysis. For example, data associated with a large number (perhapshundreds of millions) of individuals may be gathered for analysis. Thedata may include identities of individuals, organizations, companies,etc. According to certain example embodiments of the disclosedtechnology, one or more types of relationships between the entities maythen be collected.

In certain embodiments, a filtering mechanism may operate against thenetworks and may retain those networks that have outlying behavior. Suchfiltering may conventionally utilize graph-or network analysis, andqueries/filtering of this form may utilize sub-graph matching routinesor fuzzy sub-graphs matching. However, sub-graph matching routines orfuzzy-sub-graphs matching techniques may be NP-complete, and thus,impractical for analyzing large sets of data. The most notablecharacteristic of NP-complete problems is that no fast solution to themis known. That is, the time required to solve the problem using anycurrently known algorithm increases very quickly as the size of theproblem grows. This means that the time required to solve evenmoderately sized versions of many of these problems can easily reachinto the billions or trillions of years, using any amount of computingpower available today. Embodiments of the disclosed technology may beutilized to determine or provide connections between entities eventhough the set of data analyzed may be extremely large.

In accordance with an example implementation of the disclosedtechnology, entities may be identified and may include people,companies, places, objects, virtual identities, etc. In an exampleembodiment, relationships may be formed in many ways, and with manyqualities. For example, co-occurrence of values in common fields in adatabase may be utilized, such as the same last name. Relationships mayalso be formed using multiple co-occurrence of an entity with one ormore other properties, such as people who have lived at two or moreaddresses.

Relationships may also be formed based on a high reoccurrence and/orfrequency of a common relationship, according to an example embodiment.For example, records of person X sending an email to person Y greaterthan N times may indicate a relationship between person X and person Y.In another example embodiment, if person X sends an email to or receivesan email from person Y, and within a short period of time, person Zsends an email or receives an email from person Y, then a relationshipmay be implied between person X and person Z.

In accordance with an example implementation of the disclosedtechnology, relationships between entities may comprise Boolean,weighted, directed, undirected, and/or combinations of multiplerelationships. According to certain example embodiments of the disclosedtechnology, clustering of the entities may rely on relationships steps.In one embodiment, entities may be related by at least two differentrelationship types. In one embodiment, relationships for the networkconnection analysis may be established by examining weights or strengthsof connections between entities in certain directions and conditionalupon other relationships, including temporal relationships. For example,in one embodiment, the directional relationships between entities X, Y,and Z may be examined and the connection between X, Y, and Z may befollowed if there is a link between Y and Z happened (in time) after thelink was established between X and Y.

Many methods may be utilized to filter networks once they areidentified. For example, in one embodiment, networks may be scored. Inanother embodiment, a threshold may be utilized to identify networks ofinterest. According to an example embodiment of the disclosedtechnology, a model may be utilized to compute a number of statistics oneach network. In one embodiment, the model may be as simple asdetermining counts. In another embodiment, the model may detectrelationships within a network, for example, entities that are relatedto the centroid of the network that are also related to each other. Thisanalysis may provide a measure of cohesiveness of relationships thatexist inside the network. According to an example embodiment of thedisclosed technology, once the statistics have been computed, scoringand weighting of each network may be utilized to determine whichnetworks rise above a particular threshold, and may be classified as“interesting.” In accordance with an example embodiment of the disclosedtechnology, and weighting and/or scoring of the determined statisticsmay be accomplished using a heuristic scoring model, such as linearregression, neural network analysis, etc.

Example implementations of the disclosed technology can utilizespecial-purpose computing systems and custom query language(s) in theprocesses described herein to provide meaningful results, as may benecessitated due to the sheer amount of data that needs to be trackedand analyzed.

Certain example implementations of the disclosed technology providetangible improvements in computer processing speeds, memory utilization,and/or programming languages. Such improvements provide certaintechnical contributions that can enable the detection of relationshipsamong individuals. In certain example implementations, the improvedcomputer systems disclosed herein may enable analysis of an entirepopulation, such as all known persons in the United States, togetherwith associated activities. The computation of such a massive amount ofdata, at the scale required to provide effective outlier detection andinformation, has been enabled by the improvements in computer processingspeeds, memory utilization, and/or programming language as disclosedherein. Those with ordinary skill in the art may recognize thattraditional methods such as human activity, pen-and-paper analysis, oreven traditional computation using general-purpose computers and/oroff-the-shelf software, are not sufficient to provide the level of dataprocessing for effective relationship-linking. As disclosed herein, thespecial-purpose computers and special-purpose programming language(s)disclosed herein can provide improved computer speed and/or memoryutilization that provide an improvement in computing technology, therebyenabling the disclosed inventions.

One of the issues that has plagued previous “relationship determination”solutions involving massive data sets is the extremely long run-timesand large amount of memory/disk space required. One of the technicalsolutions provided by the technology disclosed herein concerns theenablement and efficiency improvement of computer systems and softwareto process relationship data, and to provide the desired data in areasonable amount of time. Certain example implementations of thedisclosed technology may be utilized to increase the efficiency ofdetection of identity-based fraud indicators.

Determining relationships among records, for example, can follow theclassical n-squared process for both time and disk space. According toan example implementation of the disclosed technology, light-weightself-joins may be utilized, for example, in generating embeddable commonlisp (ECL). But disk-space utilization might still be high. Certainexample implementations of the disclosed technology may enable a corejoin to be split into parts, each of which is persisted. This has theadvantage of breaking a potentially very long join into n parts whileallowing others a time slice. This has an effect of reducing diskconsumption by a factor of n, provided the eventual links are fairlysparse. In terms of performance, it should be noted that if n can bemade high enough that the output of each join does not spill to disk,the relationship calculation process may have significantly fasterperformance.

In accordance with certain example implementations, linking of recordsmay be performed by certain additional special programming and analysissoftware. For example, record linking fits into a general class of dataprocessing known as data integration, which can be defined as theproblem of combining information from multiple heterogeneous datasources. Data integration can include data preparation steps such asparsing, profiling, cleansing, normalization, and parsing andstandardization of the raw input data prior to record linkage to improvethe quality of the input data and to make the data more consistent andcomparable (these data preparation steps are sometimes referred to asETL or extract, transform, load).

Data profiling, data hygiene and data source consistency checking, whilekey components of the record linking process, have their own valuewithin the data integration process and may be utilized herein forleverage even when record linking is not a necessary part of aparticular data work unit. Implementations of the disclosed technologymay utilize concepts such as term specificity to determine therelevance/weight of a particular field in the scope of the linkingprocess, and a mathematical model based on the input data, rather thanthe need for hand coded user rules, which may be key to the overallefficiency of the method.

Certain example implementations of the disclosed technology may beutilized to prevent fraud by verifying identities, activities, and otherfactors, and using relationship information to determine where collusiveactivities might exist.

In accordance with an example implementation of the disclosedtechnology, and as discussed above, a persistent data structure may beutilized as part of splitting a core join, for example, to increase theperformance of the computer processor and/or to reduce the disc/memoryutilization requirements in determining relationships among records. Thepersistent data structure, according to certain example implementationsof the disclosed technology, is a data structure that preserves theprevious version of itself when it is modified. Such data structures maybe effectively immutable, as their operations do not update thestructure in-place, but instead may yield a new updated structure.Certain example implementations may utilize a meld or merge operationthat can create a new version from two previous versions. In certainexample implementations, the persistent data structure(s) can also becreated using in-place updating of data and these may, in general, useless time or storage space than their purely functional counterparts. Incertain example implementations, persistence can be achieved by simplecopying. Certain example implementations of the disclosed technologyexploit a similarity between the new and old versions to share structurebetween versions.

Certain embodiments of the disclosed technology may enable the detectionof possible, probable, and/or actual identity theft-related fraud, forexample, as associated with a request for credit, payment, or a benefit.Certain example implementations provide for disambiguating inputinformation and determining a likelihood of fraud. In certain exampleimplementations, the input information may be received from a requestingentity in relation to a request for credit, payment, or benefit. Incertain example implementations, the input information may be receivedfrom a requesting entity in relation to a request for an activity from abusiness or government agency. In certain example implementations, theentity may be a natural person (i.e., human). In other exampleimplementations, the entity may be represented as a natural person, butmay actually be associated with a synthetic identity.

In accordance with an example implementation of the disclosedtechnology, input information associated with an entity may beprocessed, weighted, scored, etc., for example, to disambiguate theinformation. Certain implementations, for example, may utilize one ormore input data fields to verify or correct other input data fields.

TABLE 2 Digital ID results Digital_id_result value Description successThe Digital ID matched an existing/known Digital ID new_digital_id A newDigital ID was generated not_enough__attribs There are not enoughattributes present to generate a Digital ID (minimum of 2 entitiesexcluding True IP are needed). low_confidence If the confidencethreshold is enabled and the digital_id_confidence for the digital ID isbelow the configured threshold, then no digital ID is returned anddigital_id_result is set to ′low_confidence′. excluded The exclusionpolicy has the ability to prevent the generation of a digital ID. If theexclusion policy decides to block/exclude Digital ID generation for agiven transaction, then digital_id_result will be set to ′excluded′.not_enough_weights The exclusion policy also has the ability tomanipulate the weightings for different entities based on behaviorsdetected by the rules. The exclusion policy can set a weighting to 0 toprevent it from being used within the Digital ID matching algorithm.Because of this a situation exists where there may be enough attributespresent to generate a digital ID, but their weightings may have beenzeroed out. This separate value is returned in this case to preventconfusion with ′not_enough_attribs″ scenario.

Table 2 provides additional information for the results of the DigitalID. In accordance with certain example implementations of the disclosedtechnology, a sub-set of entities (Account Number, Account Name, AccountLogin) may be restricted to local-only usage due to a low likelihood ofan individual securing the same login/account name across multipleorganizations. For example, John Smith may have signed-up with a firstorganization several years ago under the login username “johnsmith.”Then a recent attempt to sign-up with a second vendor using the samelogin username may be unsuccessful as “johnsmith” was already taken, sothe username “johnsmith723” may be used instead.

In accordance with certain example implementations of the disclosedtechnology, after a Digital ID has been created, certain exampleimplementations of the disclosed technology may utilize the Digital IDto separate bad identities from good identities. Such knowledge may beutilized to validate legitimate returning customers and reducetransaction friction. Certain example implementations of the disclosedtechnology may be utilized to actively block attempts to access anaccount or conduct a transaction if suspicious behavior is detected. Byaccurately distinguishing good customers from fraudsters, cybercriminalsimpersonating legitimate customer may be quickly detected by theirattempted fraudulent and/or anomalous transactions.

In certain example implementations, a trust score may be utilized as acomprehensive risk assessment score for Digital ID intelligence. Certainexample implementations of the trust score may represent fraud risk,threat, vulnerability, and reputation of the Digital ID, and mayleverage the big data power of a Digital Identity Network and globalshared intelligence to generate such score. In certain exampleimplementations, the following analytics components may be built intothe trust score for a Digital ID: global reason codes, global smart rulevariables, Digital ID pivoted variables, Digital ID confidence scores,fraud data, and/or potential threat data.

In certain example implementations, the trust score may be accessible tocustomers and can be used directly in the customer policies in makingbetter decisions in identifying trusted consumers to reduce falsepositives. Certain example implementations of the disclosed technologymay utilize the trust score in associated models to improve frauddetection performance. In certain example implementations, the one ormore attribute variables can include a number or frequency of one ormore of: devices, electronic messages, and transactions associated withthe entity identifier. In certain example implementations, the aggregatethreat score may further be based on known instances of fraud associatedwith the entity identifier. According to an example implementation ofthe disclosed technology, the aggregate threat score may includetime-based decay weighs according to the temporal information. Incertain example implementations, the entity or user is one or more of ahuman, a household, and a family. In certain example implementations, aplurality of attribute indications can represent assets that areattributed to the entity or user identifier.

According to certain example implementations of the disclosedtechnology, different modeling approaches may be utilized forimplementing trust scores according to a Digital ID depending on theavailable data, desired accuracy, and/or time or computing constraints.

Certain example implementations of the disclosed technology may providethe following technical benefits and/or technical functions: (a) bothonline and offline data attributes may be utilized together to form adynamic and unique persona identifier (ID) that is anonymized; thegenerative identity resolution process may be driven by real-worlddigitized interactions, not just data mapping to fields; a digitalidentity graph, leveraging machine learning, may connect the disparateonline and offline attributes and express them as one unique personaidentifier that is anonymized; complete anonymity is ensured with boththe persona identifiers and underlying data attributes; the system isbuilt upon tokenized, encrypted identity attributes that cannot behacked or reversed into personally identifiable information (PII); aview of a persona identity and attributes may be provided through themerging of the offline and online data; a consistent, universal, andfrictionless approach may be utilized across consumer touch pointsspanning new account openings, login transactions, and paymenttransactions.

Given a resolved digital identity and its activities in the Internet andmobile channels, a set of interface and analysis features are providedby embodiments disclosed herein for use in fraud prevention,identification, user classification with potential to pursue other usecases such as credit evaluation, cross device ad targeting and others.

According to an example implementation of the disclosed technology, theanonymized persona identifiers according to the disclosed technologyare: (a) stable and representative; (b) accurate an encompassing; (c)explainable and relevant; and (d) safe. The anonymized personaidentifiers, according to the disclosed technology, may be resistant tocontamination by shared elements such as: shared IP address, sharedemail, and/or shared device. As a guidance for step one 90% of entitiesmay need to be singular, 8% can belong to same household or place ofwork, 2% can be outright wrong. In other words, false positive tolerancefor incorrect identity resolution i.e. a proportion of the population,will be able to be individually recognized vs households ororganizations

Given that users often have multiple assets of each class e.g. differentprivate emails, work emails, lived in different homes, the concept ofanonymized persona identifiers may only be as useful as it is able tocreate a singular entity that strongly correlates the assets. Withoutsuch correlation, there may be no information gain and value beyond thesingle tracked attribute. As a guidance the entities should converge at90% single anonymized persona identifier for single person, 8% for 2anonymized persona identifiers for single person and 2% with 3 or more.

The anonymized persona identifier may inspire confidence in the use ofdata. The data required to resolve an entity and the data attached tothe entity may need to be current to the extent possible. As ahigh-level guidance entity resolution data (which emails belong to whichanonymized persona identifier) can be current within 48 hours whileevents and assertions connected to the anonymized persona identifiershould be near real time. The disclosed technology relates to anevent-driven identity resolution process that may need to maintainglobal state in-order to ensure that each event is both a ‘match’process and an ‘insert’ process. For example, a hacker can hit a useraccount in China and Australia seconds apart, and the global identityresolution may need to happen in real-time such that the same attackeris accurately identified, and the second attack can potentially be morethoroughly averted.

As identities may have different transient properties, a largedivergence in identity linkages in a short period of time may indicatean attack on an identity. Certain example implementations of thedisclosed technology provide the ability to resolve the longer-termstable identity while either flagging, ignoring, or dissolving shortlived associations.

As used herein, the terms “data,” “content,” “information,” and similarterms may be used interchangeably to refer to data capable of beingtransmitted, received, and/or stored in accordance with the disclosedtechnology. Thus, use of any such terms should not be taken to limit thespirit and scope of the present disclosure. Further, where a computingdevice is described herein to receive data from another computingdevice, it will be appreciated that the data may be received directlyfrom another computing device or may be received indirectly via one ormore intermediary computing devices, such as, for example, one or moreservers, relays, routers, network access points, base stations, hosts,and/or the like, sometimes referred to herein as a “network.” Similarly,where a computing device is described herein to send data to anothercomputing device, it will be appreciated that the data may be sentdirectly to another computing device or may be sent indirectly via oneor more intermediary computing devices, such as, for example, one ormore servers, relays, routers, network access points, base stations,hosts, and/or the like.

As used herein, the terms “human identity,” “user,” “client,”“consumer,” and “customer” may be used interchangeably to refer, withoutlimitation, to a human, client, customer, purchaser, shopper, user andthe like who may be using any number of client devices and/or onlineidentities to receive and interact with networked digital content.

The term “API” refers to an Application Programming Interface (API),which is a set of subroutine definitions, protocols, and tools forbuilding application software. An API is a set of clearly definedmethods of communication between various software components. An API maybe for a web-based system, operating system, database system, computerhardware or software library. An API specification can take many forms,but often includes specifications for routines, data structures, objectclasses, variables or remote calls. POSIX, Microsoft Windows API, theC++ Standard Template Library and Java APIs are examples of differentforms of APIs.

Methods, apparatuses, and computer program products of the presentdisclosure may be embodied by any of a variety of devices. For example,the method, apparatus, and computer program product of an exampleembodiment may be embodied by a networked device, such as a server orother network entity, configured to communicate with one or moredevices, such as one or more client devices. Additionally, oralternatively, the computing device may include fixed computing devices,such as a personal computer or a computer workstation. Still further,example embodiments may be embodied by any of a variety of mobiledevices, such as a portable digital assistant (PDA), mobile telephone,smartphone, laptop computer, tablet computer, wearable, or anycombination of the aforementioned devices.

As will be appreciated, any such computer program instructions and/orother type of code may be loaded onto a computer, processor, or otherprogrammable apparatus's circuitry to produce a machine, such that thecomputer, processor, or other programmable circuitry that execute thecode on the machine create the means for implementing various functions,including those described herein.

It is also noted that all or some of the information presented by theexample displays discussed herein can be based on data that is received,generated, and/or maintained by one or more components of apparatusesherein. In some embodiments, one or more external systems (such as aremote cloud computing and/or data storage system) may also be leveragedto provide at least some of the functionality discussed herein.

As described above and as will be appreciated based on this disclosure,embodiments of the present disclosure may be configured as methods,mobile devices, backend network devices, and the like. Accordingly,embodiments may comprise various means including entirely of hardware orany combination of software and hardware. Furthermore, embodiments maytake the form of a computer program product on at least onenon-transitory computer-readable storage medium having computer-readableprogram instructions (e.g., computer software) embodied in the storagemedium. Any suitable computer-readable storage medium may be utilizedincluding non-transitory hard disks, CD-ROMs, flash memory, opticalstorage devices, or magnetic storage devices.

Embodiments of the subject matter and the operations described hereincan be implemented in digital electronic circuitry, or in computersoftware, firmware, or hardware, including the structures disclosed inthis specification and their structural equivalents, or in combinationsof one or more of them. Embodiments of the subject matter describedherein can be implemented as one or more computer programs, i.e., one ormore modules of computer program instructions, encoded on computerstorage medium for execution by, or to control the operation of,information/data processing apparatus. Alternatively, or in addition,the program instructions can be encoded on an artificially-generatedpropagated signal, e.g., a machine-generated electrical, optical, orelectromagnetic signal, which is generated to encode information/datafor transmission to suitable receiver apparatus for execution by aninformation/data processing apparatus. A computer storage medium can be,or be included in, a computer-readable storage device, acomputer-readable storage substrate, a random or serial access memoryarray or device, or a combination of one or more of them. Moreover,while a computer storage medium is not a propagated signal, a computerstorage medium can be a source or destination of computer programinstructions encoded in an artificially-generated propagated signal. Thecomputer storage medium can also be, or be included in, one or moreseparate physical components or media (e.g., multiple CDs, disks, orother storage devices).

The operations described herein can be implemented as operationsperformed by an information/data processing apparatus oninformation/data stored on one or more computer-readable storage devicesor received from other sources.

The terms “data processing apparatus,” “computing devices,” and “mobilecomputing devices” encompass all kinds of apparatus, devices, andmachines for processing data, including by way of example a programmableprocessor, a computer, a system on a chip, or multiple ones, orcombinations, of the foregoing. The apparatus can include specialpurpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array)or an ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit). The apparatus canalso include, in addition to hardware, code that creates an executionenvironment for the computer program in question, e.g., code thatconstitutes processor firmware, a protocol stack, a database managementsystem, an operating system, a cross-platform runtime environment, avirtual machine, or a combination of one or more of them. The apparatusand execution environment can realize various different computing modelinfrastructures, such as web services, distributed computing and gridcomputing infrastructures.

A computer program (also known as a program, software, softwareapplication, script, or code) can be written in any form of programminglanguage, including compiled or interpreted languages, declarative orprocedural languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as astand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, object, orother unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computerprogram may, but need not, correspond to a file in a file system. Aprogram can be stored in a portion of a file that holds other programsor information/data (e.g., one or more scripts stored in a markuplanguage document), in a single file dedicated to the program inquestion, or in multiple coordinated files (e.g., files that store oneor more modules, sub-programs, or portions of code). A computer programcan be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computersthat are located at one site or distributed across multiple sites andinterconnected by a communication network.

The processes and logic flows described herein can be performed by oneor more programmable processors executing one or more computer programsto perform actions by operating on input information/data and generatingoutput. Processors suitable for the execution of a computer programinclude, by way of example, both general and special purposemicroprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of digitalcomputer. Generally, a processor will receive instructions andinformation/data from a read-only memory or a random-access memory orboth. The essential elements of a computer are a processor forperforming actions in accordance with instructions and one or morememory devices for storing instructions and data. Generally, a computerwill also include, or be operatively coupled to receive information/datafrom or transfer information/data to, or both, one or more mass storagedevices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto-optical disks, oroptical disks. However, a computer need not have such devices. Devicessuitable for storing computer program instructions and information/datainclude all forms of non-volatile memory, media, and memory devices,including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, e.g., EPROM,EEPROM, and flash memory devices; magnetic disks, e.g., internal harddisks or removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and CD-ROM and DVD-ROMdisks. The processor and the memory can be supplemented by, orincorporated in, special purpose logic circuitry.

To provide for interaction with a user, embodiments of the subjectmatter described herein can be implemented on a computer having adisplay device, e.g., a CRT (cathode ray tube) or LCD (liquid crystaldisplay) monitor, for displaying information/data to the user and akeyboard and a pointing device, e.g., a mouse or a trackball, by whichthe user can provide input to the computer. Other kinds of devices canbe used to provide for interaction with a user as well; for example,feedback provided to the user can be any form of sensory feedback, e.g.,visual feedback, auditory feedback, or tactile feedback; and input fromthe user can be received in any form, including acoustic, speech, ortactile input. In addition, a computer can interact with a user bysending documents to and receiving documents from a device that is usedby the user; for example, by sending web pages to a web browser on auser's client device in response to requests received from the webbrowser.

Embodiments of the subject matter described herein can be implemented ina computing system that includes a back-end component, e.g., as aninformation/data server, or that includes a middleware component, e.g.,an application server, or that includes a front-end component, e.g., aclient computer having a graphical user interface or a web browserthrough which a user can interact with an implementation of the subjectmatter described herein, or any combination of one or more suchback-end, middleware, or front-end components. The components of thesystem can be interconnected by any form or medium of digitalinformation/data communication, e.g., a communication network. Examplesof communication networks include a local area network (“LAN”) and awide area network (“WAN”), an inter-network (e.g., the Internet), andpeer-to-peer networks (e.g., ad hoc peer-to-peer networks).

The computing system can include clients and servers. A client andserver are generally remote from each other and typically interactthrough a communication network. The relationship of client and serverarises by virtue of computer programs running on the respectivecomputers and having a client-server relationship to each other. In someembodiments, a server transmits information/data (e.g., an HTML page) toa client device (e.g., for purposes of displaying information/data toand receiving user input from a user interacting with the clientdevice). Information/data generated at the client device (e.g., a resultof the user interaction) can be received from the client device at theserver.

As utilized herein, the term “or” is used herein in both the alternativeand conjunctive sense, unless otherwise indicated. The terms“illustrative” and “exemplary” are used to be examples with noindication of quality level. Like numbers refer to like elementsthroughout.

While this specification contains many specific implementation details,these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of anydisclosures or of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions offeatures specific to embodiments of particular disclosures. Certainfeatures that are described herein in the context of separateembodiments can also be implemented in combination in a singleembodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in thecontext of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multipleembodiments separately or in any suitable sub-combination. Moreover,although features may be described above as acting in certaincombinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more featuresfrom a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from thecombination, and the claimed combination may be directed to asub-combination or variation of a sub-combination.

Similarly, while operations are depicted in the drawings in a particularorder, this should not be understood as requiring that such operationsbe performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, orthat all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirableresults. In certain circumstances, multitasking and parallel processingmay be advantageous. Moreover, the separation of various systemcomponents in the embodiments described above should not be understoodas requiring such separation in all embodiments, and it should beunderstood that the described program components and systems cangenerally be integrated together in a single software product orpackaged into multiple software products.

Thus, particular embodiments of the subject matter have been described.Other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims. In somecases, the actions recited in the claims can be performed in a differentorder and still achieve desirable results. In addition, the processesdepicted in the accompanying figures do not necessarily require theparticular order shown, or sequential order, to achieve desirableresults. In certain implementations, multitasking and parallelprocessing may be advantageous.

Many modifications and other embodiments of the disclosures set forthherein will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which thesedisclosures pertain having the benefit of the teachings presented in theforegoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is tobe understood that the disclosures are not to be limited to the specificembodiments disclosed and that modifications and other embodiments areintended to be included within the scope of the appended claims.Although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in a genericand descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation.

What is claimed is:
 1. A system comprising: one or more processors;memory in communication with the one or more processors; instructionsstored in the memory that, when executed by the one or more processors,cause the system to perform: receiving, via a communications network,user identification (User ID) responsive to initiation of identitymonitoring enrollment of a user via a user device; extracting, from theuser device, unique device identification (Device ID); generating ananonymized digital identification (Digital ID) based on one or more ofthe Device ID and the User ID; detecting, via a Digital Identity Network(DIN) in communication with a plurality of website monitoringapplication programming interfaces (APIs) executing on a correspondingplurality of websites, an identity-related event corresponding to theDigital ID; determining, using a machine learning model in communicationwith the one or more processors, whether the identity-related eventmeets one or more threshold criteria; generating an alert responsive tothe threshold criteria being met by the identity-related event; andtransmitting the alert.
 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the Digital IDis generated without requiring receiving personal identificationinformation (PII) from the user.
 3. The system of claim 1, whereingenerating the anonymized digital identification (Digital ID) is furtherbased on derived personal identification information (PII) associatedwith the user.
 4. The system of claim 1, further comprising associatingthe Digital ID with the User ID.
 5. The system of claim 1, wherein thealert comprises the User ID and identification of the identity-relatedevent.
 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the alert is transmitted to anidentity monitoring service associated with the identity monitoringenrollment of the user.
 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the thresholdcriteria is based on one or more of rules, logic, and trust tags.
 8. Thesystem of claim 1, wherein results of the determining are fed back torefine the machine learning model.
 9. The system of claim 1, whereingenerating the Digital ID comprises a combination of the User ID and theDevice ID.
 10. The system of claim 1, wherein the Device ID comprisesone or more of: cellular service provider, media files, capacity, systeminformation, model number, serial number, Wi-Fi address, Bluetoothaddress, IMEI number, ICCID number, firmware version, installed drivers,and installed fonts.
 11. A method, comprising: receiving useridentification (User ID) responsive to initiation of identity monitoringenrollment of a user via a user device; extracting, from the userdevice, unique device identification (Device ID); generating ananonymized digital identification (Digital ID) based on one or more ofthe Device ID and the User ID; detecting, via a Digital Identity Network(DIN) in communication with a plurality of website monitoringapplication programming interfaces (APIs) executing on a correspondingplurality of websites, an identity-related event corresponding to theDigital ID; determining, using a machine learning model in communicationwith one or more processors, whether the identity-related event meetsone or more threshold criteria; generating an alert responsive to thethreshold criteria being met by the identity-related event; andtransmitting the alert.
 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the DigitalID is generated without requiring receiving personal identificationinformation (PII) from the user.
 13. The method of claim 11, whereingenerating the anonymized digital identification (Digital ID) is furtherbased on derived personal identification information (PII) associatedwith the user.
 14. The method of claim 11, wherein the alert comprisesthe User ID and identification of the identity-related event.
 15. Themethod of claim 11, wherein the threshold criteria is based on one ormore of rules, logic, and trust tags.
 16. The method of claim 11,wherein results of the determining are fed back to refine the machinelearning model.
 17. The method of claim 11, wherein generating theDigital ID comprises a combination of the User ID and the Device ID. 18.The method of claim 11, wherein the DIN is in communication with aplurality of business servers hosting the corresponding plurality ofwebsites.
 19. The method of claim 11, wherein the website monitoringAPIs are configured to transmit encrypted event information to the DIN.20. The method of claim 11, wherein the Device ID comprises one or moreof: cellular service provider, media files, capacity, systeminformation, model number, serial number, Wi-Fi address, Bluetoothaddress, IMEI number, ICCID number, firmware version, installed drivers,and installed fonts.